A Review of Best Practices Related to Intravenous Line Management for Nurses.

The insertion, use, and maintenance of peripheral and central intravenous lines are skills used by nurses in a variety of health care and hospital settings. However, patient vascular access is not without potential complications that can result in patient harm. The aim of this review is to identify and summarize nursing research standards of care, and best practices for safe management and prevention of catheter-associated bloodstream infections related to peripheral intravascular (PIV) and central intravenous (CVC) line placement. The authors focused on concepts of site selection, skin preparation and insertion, securement, and maintenance and removal criteria for PIV and CVC.

Indications for venous access in oncology - recommendations of national professional societies and current state in the Czech Republic.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the paper is to present the current recommendations and indications of venous access in oncology which reflect and recognize the opinions of national and international professional societies. It focuses exclusively on the indications of intravenous catheter placement for anticancer treatment, such as medium-term and long-term venous accesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey results obtained from a national questionnaire of 24 oncology centers identified the current situation in the Czech Republic. There were evaluated relevant data on the number of and the criteria for the introduction of venous accesses provided by physicians. Comparisons were made between current oncological practice and recommendations provided by evidence-based medicine. RESULTS: At each center surveyed in the Czech Republic, an average of 130 ports and 80 permanent implanted central catheters are introduced annually. The ports are increasingly indicated, with over a half of the centers surveyed introducing ports to more than 100 patients a year, with four centers introducing a total of 1,600 ports annually. In all centers, the decision for venous access is made by an oncologist. However, most procedures are performed by a doctor of another specialization, most often by a surgeon, a radiologist or an anesthesiologist. More than a half of the indications for venous access placement result from poor peripheral venous system or complications of parenteral therapy, not from comprehensive assessment prior to the initiation of the therapy. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, we developed general indications and recommendations for venous access to cancer patients which represent the consensus of an interdisciplinary team of specialists, predominantly from the committee of professional societies - the Society for Ports and Permanent Catheters, the Working Group of Nutritional Care in Oncology of the Czech Oncological Society and the Society of Clinical Nutrition and Intensive Metabolic Care. The number of introduced venous access catheters remains insufficient to meet the needs in the Czech Republic, which necessitates increased awareness and possibilities for safe drug administration.

Standard Versus Long Peripheral Catheters for Multiday IV Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: In children, intravenous therapy (IVT) is generally administered via peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) (2-6 cm in length). There is evidence that PIVCs are unreliable after 2 days. Long peripheral catheters (LPCs) (6-15 cm in length) could improve the delivery of IVT. The aim of this trial was to determine if LPCs could decrease catheter failure and the number of catheters in children receiving multiday IVT. METHODS: This was an open-label randomized controlled trial conducted at Monash Children's Hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were from the ages of 1 to 17 years, undergoing surgery and requiring >48 hours of postoperative IVT. Participants were randomly assigned to a 2.5-cm 22G PIVC or an 8-cm 22G LPC. RESULTS: Seventy-two children were randomly assigned, 36 received PIVCs, and 36 received LPCs. The median duration of IVT was 5.1 days and was similar between groups (P = .9). Catheter failure was higher for PIVCs than LPCs (66.7% vs 19.4%; relative risk [RR]: 3.4; P = .0001 or 187.9 vs 41.0 failures per 1000 catheter-days). Infiltration was the most common reason for PIVC failure (33.3% vs 2.8%; RR: 12.0; P = .001). LPCs exhibited superior life span (4.7 vs 3.5 days [median]; P = .01). Children with LPCs were twice as likely to complete therapy with a single catheter (80.6% vs 38.9%; RR: 2.1; P = .0006). CONCLUSIONS: LPCs reduce catheter failure and total catheters in children. They should be considered as the first-line device for peripheral access in any child receiving prolonged IVT.

Durability of tunneled catheters in children is associated with catheter tip depth: A single-center report.

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of different catheter tip positions on catheter duration and dysfunction of tunneled catheters in children. Catheters were evaluated for place of insertion, time of insertion, catheter tip depth and position, duration of use, and reason for removal. The mean duration of implanted catheters with tips placed in cavo-atrial junction/right atrium was significantly longer with significantly lower percentage of complications than tips placed in superior vena cava. Only catheter tips placed in cavo-atrial junction/right atrium was a predictor of catheter functionality and survival. Shorter catheter survival in children with tunneled catheters is a consequence of a catheter tip depth proximal of CAJ and RA. Our results showed that the main factor responsible for better catheter functionality was not laterality but the depth of the catheter tip, which reduces need for future catheter insertions with increased catheter durability.

Intra- and Inter-Rater Agreement between X-Ray Views for Umbilical Catheter Position.

OBJECTIVE: We determined intra- and inter-rater agreement for umbilical arterial/venous catheter (umbilical arterial catheter [UAC] and umbilical venous catheter [UVC], respectively) positions on supine anteroposterior (AP) and horizontal dorsal decubitus (HDD) X-ray views to determine whether two views are routinely required. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study was conducted in McMaster University, Canada. Pairs of AP and HDD radiographs were coded and rated in random sequence by two experienced raters. Primary outcome was intra-rater agreement (κ) between AP and HDD views for UVC catheter tip position. Secondary outcomes included inter-rater κ for UVC position; inter- and intra-rater κ for UAC position, inter- and intra-rater κ for follow-up action. To detect κ of 0.8 (width of 95% confidence interval = 0.1), 138 radiograph pairs were required. RESULTS: Intra-rater agreement tended to be higher for UVC versus UAC position (Rater#1: κ = 0.44 vs. 0.16, respectively, p = 0.08; and #2: κ = 0.56 vs. 0.47, respectively, p = 0.5). Inter-rater agreement was higher on AP versus HDD view for UVC position (κ = 0.6 vs. 0.29, respectively, p = 0.03) and action recommended for UVC (κ = 0.61 and 0.19, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: AP is superior to HDD view for UVC.

Vascular Access Device Care and Management: A Comprehensive Organizational Approach.

The Infusion Nurses Society asserts that a comprehensive organizational approach to vascular access device (VAD) care and management is imperative to ensure safe and efficacious patient care. It is essential that each organization (1) develops policies and procedures to align VAD care and management with recognized standards of practice; (2) integrates unique aspects of organization-selected VAD care products into policies and procedures and establishes expectations for adherence to these organizational directives; (3) develops a framework for gathering and analyzing clinical data related to patient outcomes for VAD care and management; (4) utilizes quality outcome data to facilitate evidence-based best practices within the organization; and (5) evaluates and facilitates educational programming to validate clinician competency.

New Directions in Ensuring Catheter Safety.

Tunneled dialysis catheters remain the most common vascular access used to initiate hemodialysis. Unfortunately, their use is associated with higher morbidity and mortality when compared with arteriovenous fistulae or grafts. Different types of catheters with different designs and material properties function differently. Additional devices and medications can be used to decrease the rates of infection and thrombosis. The current available tunneled dialysis catheters remain far from the desired goal and innovation in the field of dialysis vascular access remains in dire need.

Holding and Mobility of Pediatric Patients With Transthoracic Intracardiac Catheters.

BACKGROUND: Nursing care of pediatric patients after cardiac surgery consists of close hemodynamic monitoring, often through transthoracic intracardiac catheters, requiring patients to remain on bed rest and limiting holding and mobility. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this quality improvement project was to determine the feasibility of safely mobilizing pediatric patients with transthoracic intracardiac catheters out of bed. Once feasibility was established, the secondary aim was to increase the number of days such patients were out of bed. METHODS AND INTERVENTIONS: New standards and procedures were implemented in July 2015 for pediatric patients with transthoracic intracardiac catheters. After initiation of the new policies, complications were tracked prospectively. Nursing documentation of activity and positioning for all patients with transthoracic intracardiac catheters was extracted from electronic health records for 2 fiscal years before and 3 fiscal years after the new policies were implemented. The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used to determine whether patterns of out-of-bed documentation changed over time. RESULTS: A total of 1358 patients (approximately 250 to 300 patients each fiscal year) had activity and positioning documented while transthoracic intracardiac catheters were in place. The Cochran-Armitage test for trend revealed that out-of-bed documentation significantly increased after the new policies and procedures were initiated (P < .001). No major complications were noted resulting from patient mobility with transthoracic intracardiac catheters. CONCLUSION: Pediatric patients with transthoracic intracardiac catheters can be safely held and mobilized out of bed.

Efficacy and clinical outcome of the port-a-cath in children: a tertiary care-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Implanted vascular access devices play an essential role in the management of pediatric patients. The objectives of this study were to assess our experience with port-a-cath insertion in pediatric patients, report its complications, and compare open versus percutaneous approaches. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study, including 568 patients who underwent port-a-cath insertion between 2013 and 2019 in our center. We grouped the patients according to the technique of insertion into two groups: group 1 (n = 168) included patients who had the open approach and group 2 (n = 404) included patients who had the percutaneous technique. (p < 0.001). RESULTS: Patients in group 1 were younger (4.10 ± 3.45 years) compared to patients in group 2 (5.47 ± 3.85 years). The main indications of insertion were hematological malignancy 57.74% (n = 328), solid organ malignancy 25.18% (n = 143), pure hematological diseases 5.46% (n = 31), metabolic diseases 2.64% (n = 15), and others for poor vascular access 8.8% (n = 50). The most common site for insertion in group 1 was the left external jugular (n = 136; 82.98%) and the left subclavian in group 2 (n = 203; 50.25%). Two hundred and two patients had a central line before catheter insertion (36.6%). Complications during insertion were comparable between both groups (p = 0.427). The catheter got stuck in 6 patients; all required additional incision and two needed venotomy. The most common reason to remove the catheter was the completion of the treatment (63.69% and 61.14%, in groups 1 and 2, respectively). The duration of the catheter was comparable between the two groups (13.14 ± 14.76 vs. 14.44 ± 14.04 months in group 1 vs.2; p = 0.327). CONCLUSIONS: Open and percutaneous port-a-cath insertions are safe in children with chronic diseases. Port-a-cath improved patients' management, and complications are infrequent. The most common complications are infection and catheter malfunction, which can be managed without catheter removal in some patients.

Developing Appropriateness Criteria for Pediatric Vascular Access.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the methodology undertaken to provide guidance on the appropriateness, as well as inappropriateness, of vascular access device selection, characteristics, and insertion technique for pediatric patients. METHODS: The RAND Corporation-University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Method was used. After definition of key terms and scope, a systematic review of the pediatric vascular access literature was undertaken. Clinical scenarios were developed to reflect the common indications for vascular access across pediatric health care. These were sectioned according to (1) device selection, (2) device characteristics, and (3) insertion technique. An interdisciplinary panel of experts (N = 14) consisting of leading experts representing diverse pediatric clinical disciplines including anesthesiology, cardiology and cardiac surgery, critical care and emergency, general surgery, hematology and oncology, hospital medicine, infectious disease, interventional radiology, pharmacology, regional pediatric hospitalist, and vascular access nursing specialties was convened. The scenarios were rated for appropriateness by the panel over 2 rounds (1 [highly inappropriate] to 9 [highly appropriate]). Round 1 ratings were completed anonymously and independently by panel members and classified into 3 levels of appropriateness: appropriate, uncertain, and inappropriate, or disagreement. For round 2, panelists met in-person to discuss the round 1 ratings and independently rerated the indications. All indications were reclassified into 3 levels of appropriateness or disagreement. CONCLUSIONS: The RAND Corporation-University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Method provides a rigorous, in-depth and transparent methodology to develop the first appropriateness criteria for the selection of pediatric vascular access devices in a range of patient groups.

Effectiveness of silver alloy-coated silicone urinary catheters in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: Results of a quality improvement initiative.

Patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (ATCSCI) have an increased risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). The effectiveness of silver alloy-coated silicone urinary catheters (SACC) in preventing CAUTI in ATCSCI is unknown and was the objective of this study. We performed a quality improvement initiative in an attempt to reduce CAUTI in patients undergoing spine surgery at a single quaternary center. Prior to July 2015, all patients received a latex indwelling catheter (LIC). All patients with ATCSCI with limited hand function (AIS A,B, or C) received a SACC. Incidence of CAUTI, microbiology, duration of infection, antibiotic susceptibility, and catheter-associated adverse events were recorded prospectively. We studied 3081 consecutive patients over the three years, of whom 302 (9.8%) had ATCSCI; 63% of ATCSCI patients were ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) A or B. The overall rate of CAUTI was 19% (585/3081), and was 38% (116/302) in patients with ATCSCI. Of 178 ATCSCI patients with LIC, 100 (56%) developed a CAUTI compared with 28 of 124 (23%) patients with SACC (p < 0.05). Poly-microbial and gram-positive infection was more common in LIC than in SACC (p < 0.05). Median duration of infection was 9 days in SACC group and 12 days in LIC group (p = 0.08). Resistance to trimethoprim (p < 0.001) and ciprofloxacin (p < 0.05) were more common in LIC group. There was no difference in catheter-associated adverse events or length of stay between the groups. This quality improvement initiative illustrates the effectiveness of antiseptic silver alloy-coated silicone urinary catheters in patients with ATCSCI. In our population, the use of SACC reduces the incidence and the complexity of CAUTI.

Use of catheter maintenance solutions by community nursing staff: an assessment.

This article discusses catheter maintenance solutions, the way they are supposed to be used and the way they actually are being used in primary and community care in the UK. It discusses the knowledge that community nursing staff have regarding these solutions and the need for further education. Appropriate assessment from a suitably trained individual is recommended, resulting in both usage and cost being dramatically decreased, offering more appropriate management and the likelihood of decreasing the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). The literature surrounding catheter maintenance solutions is investigated, and the lack of available evidence is highlighted. Preliminary research exploring primary and community care nurses' knowledge of catheter maintenance solutions is also discussed.

Tunneled dialysis catheter exchange through fibrin sheath crevice vs in situ catheter exchange for the treatment of catheter dysfunction.

Our aim is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) exchange through fibrin sheath crevice vs in situ catheter exchange in hemodialysis patients with fibrin-sheath-related catheter dysfunction. Patients with fibrin-sheath-related catheter dysfunction who underwent TDC exchange in our center between 2012 January and 2017 December were retrospectively screened. The included patients were divided into the sheath-crevice group (catheter was exchanged through fibrin sheath crevice) and the in situ group (catheter was exchanged in situ). The blood volume, Kt/V values, and complications were assessed as outcomes. Of the 44 included patients, 25 underwent in situ catheter exchange and 19 underwent catheter exchange through the fibrin sheath crevice. The stabilized maximal blood flow during the first hemodialysis after the catheter replacement reached 250 mL/min in all of the included patients. After 3 months, the stabilized maximal blood flow of the in situ group and the sheath-crevice group were 245.3 ± 9.0 and 244.8 ± 10.05 mL/min (P = .963), respectively. However, after 6 months, the stabilized maximal blood flow during hemodialysis (P = .048) and the Kt/V value (P < .001) of the patients in the sheath-crevice group were significantly higher than the in situ group. No severe complication related to the catheter exchange surgery was observed in either group. For patients with TDC dysfunction caused by fibrin sheath, catheter exchange through the fibrin sheath crevice most likely is a safe and effective alternative strategy for in situ catheter exchange.

Percutaneous Inserted Venous Catheter via Femoral Vein in Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the applicability of the insertion of small diameter catheters through the femoral vein in extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants. STUDY DESIGN: All femoral small diameter catheters (Silastic or femoral arterial catheter [FAC]) inserted in ELBW infants in a tertiary level neonatal intensive care unit were retrospectively reviewed. Success rate, dwelling time, and percutaneously inserted central venous catheter-related complications were recorded. RESULTS: Thirteen small diameter catheters were inserted in seven ELBW infants. Mean gestational age at birth was 25+3 weeks (standard deviation [SD] ± 2.12) and mean birth weight was 686 g (SD ± 204.9). Mean weight at the first time of insertion was 1,044 g (SD ± 376.3). In two occasions, a FAC was used instead of a Silastic. In most cases (11/13, 84.6%), the patient was intubated prior to the procedure. The mean dwelling time was 16.7 days (SD ± 9.8). Most of the inserted small diameter catheters were removed electively (8/12, 66.7%), except for one episode of clinical sepsis from coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and three cases of accidental line extravasation. No other complications were reported. The success rate was 92.3%. CONCLUSION: Femoral venous catheterization using small diameter catheters in ELBW infants may be promising when other routes have been exhausted. Our results support that it is a feasible technique that can be performed at the bedside with successful results when conducted by experienced personnel.

A Randomized Trial Comparing Outcomes of 3 Types of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters.

BACKGROUND: There was an increase in peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) complications and adverse patient events after product conversion during the merger between a rural hospital and a larger hospital system. A review of the existing literature identified a gap in evidence evaluating 2 closed PIVC systems compared with an open PIVC system. PURPOSE: The purpose of the current project was to ascertain whether open or closed PIVCs are best for patients, staff, and the health care system in terms of 3 main criteria: quality, safety, and cost. METHODS: A prospective, 2-site randomized controlled trial was used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: There were no differences in the complication rates between catheter types. There was a statistically significant increase in blood leakage and a decrease in clinician satisfaction with the open-system catheter. CONCLUSIONS: Our project supports current clinical recommendation that a closed PIVC system, regardless of type, is not only safer and cost-effective but also preferred by patients and clinicians.

Current port maintenance strategies are insufficient: View based on actual presentations of implanted ports.

Nursing staff play a crucial role in maintaining a functional port. Nursing guidelines recommend standard maintenance with 10 ml irrigation without consideration for variations among patients and individual nursing staff. The aim of this study is to identify the efficacy of the current maintenance strategy and analyze the correlation between complications and actual port presentations, based on disassembled intravenous ports after removal from patients. We attempt to organize the information and propose a definite maintenance strategy.After treatment completion, or due to complications, 434 implanted intravenous ports were removed from patients. All ports were deconstructed to observe their actual presentations and were then analyzed in conjunction with medical records. The correlation between complications and actual presentations was analyzed.From March 2012 to December 2017, 434 implanted intravenous ports were removed from oncology patients after completion of treatment or catheter related complications. From the view of maintenance related presentations, injection chamber blood clot was highly correlated with chemotherapy completion (P < .001) and malfunction (P = .005), while tip blood clot (P = .043) was related with chemotherapy completion and catheter fibrin (P = .015) was related to malfunction. From the view of structure related presentations, broken catheter integrity was correlated to chemotherapy completion (P = .007), fracture (P < .001), and malfunction (P = .008). Compression groove was related to chemotherapy completion (P = .03) and broken catheter at protruding stud was related to fracture (P = .04), while diaphragm rupture was correlated to chemotherapy completion (P = .048) and malfunction. (P < .001).Current port maintenance is insufficient for ideal port maintenance, whereby maintenance-related presentations, including tip clot, catheter fibrin, and injection chamber blood clot were identified. We propose a recommended maintenance strategy based on our findings. Structure-related presentations, including broken catheter integrity, broken catheter at protruding stud and diaphragm rupture were seen in patients with longer implantation period. Removal of the implanted port may be considered after 5 years if no disease relapse is noted.

Performance characteristics of the PowerFlow apheresis port: Early experience.

We prospectively evaluated the Bard PowerFlow Implantable Apheresis IV Port in four patients undergoing outpatient therapeutic plasma exchange over 18 to 97 days. Three had bilateral internal jugular access ports, and one had a single left internal jugular access port for the inlet line with return via antecubital vein. Two patients receiving 5% albumin as replacement fluid achieved peak inlet flow of 99 ± 5 mL/min and 101 ± 6 mL/min, and peak plasma flow of 53 ± 6 and 47 ± 6 mL/min, respectively. Two patients receiving plasma as replacement fluid achieved peak inlet flow of 46 ± 7 and 85 ± 4 mL/min and peak plasma flow of 27 ± 3 and 35 ± 4 mL/min, respectively. Apheresis nurses accessed the ports on the first attempt in all procedures. Pressure alarms occurred in 6 of 47 procedures and were easily resolved by lowering the inlet rate by 10% in 5 of them. The PowerFlow shows promise as an implantable venous access device for apheresis.

Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Improved Outcomes and Reduced Costs Through Identification of Catheter Malfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Two patients previously implanted with intrathecal Baclofen (ITB) pumps for management of intractable spasticity due to multiple sclerosis (MS) were referred to our center for ongoing management of their spasticity. Initial evaluation of these patients revealed high levels of spasticity in the presence of ITB doses 10 times the average daily dose of our other MS patients. CLINICAL FACTS: High doses of ITB required frequent clinical visits and result in high drug and procedure costs. Both patients' daily doses were greater than 1000 mcg/day resulting in clinical visits every 1-2 months with drug and procedure costs ranging from 16 to 23 thousand dollars annually based on Medicare national average pricing for physician's office. Of the 59 MS patients receiving ITB therapy at our institution, the mean, median, and mode daily doses for ITB are 184, 115, and 159 mcg/day, respectively. The high ITB doses in these patients and poor spasticity control raised suspicion for pump/catheter malfunction and prompted immediate troubleshooting. FINDINGS: One patient's catheter was found to be disconnected from the pump and the other's catheter tip was outside the intrathecal space. In both cases, the patients were not receiving the therapy. After pump/catheter replacement, both patients received excellent clinical benefits from ITB at significantly lower daily doses. This reduction in dose resulted in decreased frequency of medication refills (twice annually) which resulted in decreased cost of care (12-19 thousand dollars savings annually per patient). DISCUSSION: These cases illustrate the need for early ITB pump troubleshooting to identify catheter problems, improve efficacy, and avoid unnecessary healthcare costs.